Talk:Suspension Reasoning

doesnt reasoning imply thinking through things logically? i think this page either needs to be greatly expanded, or re-titled. currently its just the table of reasons why cars in general have suspension.

I propose expanding according to an outline similar to the following:

• What can suspension do (current table)
• Benefits FOR AN FSAE/FS IN CONTEXT (re-contextualize table)
• Common FSAE/FS implementations, why almost all use a-arms
• maybe how to think through suspension issues logically, from data

I'd like to move this text to the suspension category, kind of as an introduction to the category. Is that okay?

If you think that is better, go ahead! Happy that you liked the content!