reasoning?

doesnt reasoning imply thinking through things logically? i think this page either needs to be greatly expanded, or re-titled. currently its just the table of reasons why cars in general have suspension.

I propose expanding according to an outline similar to the following:

• What can suspension do (current table)
• Benefits FOR AN FSAE/FS IN CONTEXT (re-contextualize table)
• Common FSAE/FS implementations, why almost all use a-arms
• maybe how to think through suspension issues logically, from data