View source for Talk:Suspension Reasoning
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- [View source↑]
- [History↑]
Contents
| Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
|---|---|---|
| reasoning? | 0 | 17:09, 27 March 2023 |
| Can I move this page? | 1 | 08:45, 25 May 2020 |
doesnt reasoning imply thinking through things logically? i think this page either needs to be greatly expanded, or re-titled. currently its just the table of reasons why cars in general have suspension.
I propose expanding according to an outline similar to the following:
- What can suspension do (current table)
- Benefits FOR AN FSAE/FS IN CONTEXT (re-contextualize table)
- Common FSAE/FS implementations, why almost all use a-arms
- maybe how to think through suspension issues logically, from data
SpookySimon (talk)
I'd like to move this text to the suspension category, kind of as an introduction to the category. Is that okay?
You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:
You can view and copy the source of this page.
Return to Thread:Talk:Suspension Reasoning/Can I move this page?/reply.