View source for Talk:Drivetrain
- [View source↑]
- [History↑]
Contents
| Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
|---|---|---|
| tripod vibration & losses | 0 | 14:58, 23 January 2023 |
| EV and ICE specific section? | 0 | 18:10, 3 April 2022 |
| Gearing | 1 | 17:28, 1 April 2022 |
| Information for/from other sections | 1 | 14:55, 16 May 2020 |
| Old Outline | 0 | 12:41, 16 May 2020 |
discuss tripod orbiting vibration, maybe just note it exists and provide link to equations
ev drivetrain has to have unique components, like in hub planetary gearboxes, and ice stuff like internal gearbox, separate sections?
move to own article?
- Geometric gearing
- phi - i_(n-1)/(i_n) <= n_(max)/n_(T_max)
- progressive
- phi_G = phi_G1 * phi_G2
- G1 and G2 are predefined constants
- i_(z-1) = i_(z) * phi_G1
- bruh moment, will likely just move to own page for full expl.
- CBR600RR is progressive
- phi_G = phi_G1 * phi_G2
^ verbatim removed from article
You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:
You can view and copy the source of this page.
Return to Thread:Talk:Drivetrain/Information for/from other sections.
definitely agree that the topics that are equivalent between EV/ICE should get their own page and just be linked to both. I think it should be reasonable that drivetrain is similar enough between ev/ice that one article can fit in both, not sure about direct drive/ in hub motors, but it shouldn't be that hard to tackle honestly
testing/validation definitely deserves an article by itself, its so general, i think the bit in the drivetrain section should be specified to testing procedures and stretegies for drivetrain and leave all the philosophising about validation to its own article