View source for Talk:Drivetrain
- [View source↑]
- [History↑]
Contents
| Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
|---|---|---|
| tripod vibration & losses | 0 | 14:58, 23 January 2023 |
| EV and ICE specific section? | 0 | 18:10, 3 April 2022 |
| Gearing | 1 | 17:28, 1 April 2022 |
| Information for/from other sections | 1 | 14:55, 16 May 2020 |
| Old Outline | 0 | 12:41, 16 May 2020 |
discuss tripod orbiting vibration, maybe just note it exists and provide link to equations
You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:
You can view and copy the source of this page.
Return to Thread:Talk:Drivetrain/EV and ICE specific section?.
move to own article?
- Geometric gearing
- phi - i_(n-1)/(i_n) <= n_(max)/n_(T_max)
- progressive
- phi_G = phi_G1 * phi_G2
- G1 and G2 are predefined constants
- i_(z-1) = i_(z) * phi_G1
- bruh moment, will likely just move to own page for full expl.
- CBR600RR is progressive
- phi_G = phi_G1 * phi_G2
^ verbatim removed from article
There are some similarities between the final drive/differential for Internal Combustion and Electric vehicles, should we make a separate page just for final drive, link the electric section here (once it's been created), or just copy/paste?
Also as was mentioned in the article, there is overlap between the electronics and validation sections, I think (as mentioned by someone else) we should add a link to the appropriate article and leave a high level simple explanation.
Definitely need another page for Differentials
definitely agree that the topics that are equivalent between EV/ICE should get their own page and just be linked to both. I think it should be reasonable that drivetrain is similar enough between ev/ice that one article can fit in both, not sure about direct drive/ in hub motors, but it shouldn't be that hard to tackle honestly
testing/validation definitely deserves an article by itself, its so general, i think the bit in the drivetrain section should be specified to testing procedures and stretegies for drivetrain and leave all the philosophising about validation to its own article