Difference between revisions of "Intake"
SpookySimon (talk | contribs) (plenum outline) |
|||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
=Basic theory= | =Basic theory= | ||
[[File:MiscIntake.JPG|right|middle|thumb|Intake system diagram]]The intake system's purpose is to direct ambient air to your engine's air intake. On more traditional road cars and unrestricted race cars, the throttle is generally placed at the inlet of your intake runner (probably should have a source) to promote fast engine response. However, allowing a manifold between the restrictor and throttle body will limit the effects of the restriction(citation). This is negated in FSAE by preventing a large volume (plenum/manifold, intercooler, etc.) prior to the throttle body. The order of system components defined by rules can be seen in the figure right and each component is discussed further down this page. | [[File:MiscIntake.JPG|right|middle|thumb|Intake system diagram]]The intake system's purpose is to direct ambient air to your engine's air intake. On more traditional road cars and unrestricted race cars, the throttle is generally placed at the inlet of your intake runner (probably should have a source) to promote fast engine response. However, allowing a manifold between the restrictor and throttle body will limit the effects of the restriction(citation). This is negated in FSAE by preventing a large volume (plenum/manifold, intercooler, etc.) prior to the throttle body. The order of system components defined by rules can be seen in the figure right and each component is discussed further down this page. | ||
| − | |||
=Throttle control= | =Throttle control= | ||
| − | The throttle allows modulation of the air coming into your intake system. Within FSAE, the throttle must fall between your restrictor and manifold or, in boosted applications, between your turbocharger/supercharger and manifold. Common solutions include actuation by throttle cable or by electronic throttle body (ETC or drive-by-wire). | + | should probably move down - not important enough to be all the way up here. The throttle allows modulation of the air coming into your intake system. Within FSAE, the throttle must fall between your restrictor and manifold or, in boosted applications, between your turbocharger/supercharger and manifold. Common solutions include actuation by throttle cable or by electronic throttle body (ETC or drive-by-wire). |
==Throttle form factors== | ==Throttle form factors== | ||
now that I think about this, I think the rabbit hole details for throttle like cabling and non-butterfly throttles should get a separate page - will do later if y'all dont (-simon) | now that I think about this, I think the rabbit hole details for throttle like cabling and non-butterfly throttles should get a separate page - will do later if y'all dont (-simon) | ||
| Line 29: | Line 28: | ||
===Barrel=== | ===Barrel=== | ||
===Iris=== | ===Iris=== | ||
| − | |||
==Cabling== | ==Cabling== | ||
If using a cable actuated throttle, the choice and routing of cable are important considerations. A push-pull cable has negligible stretch/flex over time and will give the greatest consistency [citation needed for strecth comparison].<br /><br />Other popular choices are shifting and brake cables used on bicycles. [structure of bike brake cable v shifter cable]. A brake cable will always have some stretch, and a thicker gage will stretch less. | If using a cable actuated throttle, the choice and routing of cable are important considerations. A push-pull cable has negligible stretch/flex over time and will give the greatest consistency [citation needed for strecth comparison].<br /><br />Other popular choices are shifting and brake cables used on bicycles. [structure of bike brake cable v shifter cable]. A brake cable will always have some stretch, and a thicker gage will stretch less. | ||
| Line 47: | Line 45: | ||
how it fits into system | how it fits into system | ||
not specific design info | not specific design info | ||
| − | |||
=Intake tuning= | =Intake tuning= | ||
(I dont know where this should go: The intake manifold typically runs from the plenum to the cylinder heads / air intake ports on the engine. It's design can be adjusted to increase performance using the tuning methods below. The manifold also contains ports for the fuel injectors. (i think this is a great place for it, maybe a section about intake structure above this to clear up all the terminology? -simon) | (I dont know where this should go: The intake manifold typically runs from the plenum to the cylinder heads / air intake ports on the engine. It's design can be adjusted to increase performance using the tuning methods below. The manifold also contains ports for the fuel injectors. (i think this is a great place for it, maybe a section about intake structure above this to clear up all the terminology? -simon) | ||
| Line 78: | Line 75: | ||
===trade-offs=== | ===trade-offs=== | ||
===mounting=== | ===mounting=== | ||
| − | |||
=Plenum= | =Plenum= | ||
| Line 84: | Line 80: | ||
* sizing considerations | * sizing considerations | ||
* shape/ form factor? | * shape/ form factor? | ||
| + | ** conical spline | ||
| + | ** top/center feed | ||
| + | ** side feed | ||
| + | ** <a href="http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.582.6654&rep=rep1&type=pdf">http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.582.6654&rep=rep1&type=pdf</a> source for intake shape | ||
| + | ** dual plenum | ||
| + | ** variable volume | ||
| + | |||
=Restrictor power limit derivation<br />= | =Restrictor power limit derivation<br />= | ||
'''Should we put in separate page?''' | '''Should we put in separate page?''' | ||
| Line 133: | Line 136: | ||
|<math>\gamma</math><br /><br /> | |<math>\gamma</math><br /><br /> | ||
|1.4<br /> | |1.4<br /> | ||
| − | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|M<br /> | |M<br /> | ||
|1<br /> | |1<br /> | ||
| − | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|<math>P_t</math> | |<math>P_t</math> | ||
| Line 146: | Line 149: | ||
| − | <br />Plugging these into the equation above yields a steady state mass flow rate of 0.074 kg air per second<br />If we assume an AFR of 13.1 (typical lambda for high torque for NA engines[citation needed]), and a Q<sub>LHV</sub> of 46 MJ/kg [citation needed], the mass air flow yields a power limit of 265.5 kW or 356 hp total energy output. If the thermal efficiency of the engine is assumed to be a nominal 33%, the maximum available mechanical power is 88.5 kW or 118 horsepower with 100% volumetric efficiency.<br /> | + | <br />Plugging these into the equation above yields a steady state mass flow rate of 0.074 kg air per second<br />If we assume an AFR of 13.1 (typical lambda for high torque for NA engines[citation needed]), and a Q<sub>LHV</sub> of 46 MJ/kg [citation needed], the mass air flow yields a power limit of 265.5 kW or 356 hp total energy output. If the thermal efficiency of the engine is assumed to be a nominal 33%, the maximum available mechanical power is 88.5 kW or 118 horsepower with 100% volumetric efficiency.<br />This limit can be exceeded by increasing the upstream pressure to greater than 1 atmosphere. This pressure increase is called forced induction. |
| − | This limit can be exceeded by increasing the upstream pressure to greater than 1 atmosphere. This pressure increase is called forced induction. | ||
| − | |||
=Forced induction= | =Forced induction= | ||
Forced induction is done by utilizing a compressor to increase the pressure seen in your manifold/plenum, leading to increased engine power and efficiency. This is accomplished by the higher manifold pressures being able to force more air into the cylinder/s on each intake stroke. The increased air in the cylinder means you can burn more fuel and maintain the same air-fuel-ratio. A denser charge will also combust faster, yielding greater energy utilization and efficiency. Common methods of implementing forced induction is by turbocharging, supercharging, or procharging. Within FSAE, a fair number of teams run forced induction, but the majority remain naturally aspirated. [citation?, not sure how to cite that I saw like 5/100 at competition in Michigan and Lincoln, maybe the competition handbooks?] | Forced induction is done by utilizing a compressor to increase the pressure seen in your manifold/plenum, leading to increased engine power and efficiency. This is accomplished by the higher manifold pressures being able to force more air into the cylinder/s on each intake stroke. The increased air in the cylinder means you can burn more fuel and maintain the same air-fuel-ratio. A denser charge will also combust faster, yielding greater energy utilization and efficiency. Common methods of implementing forced induction is by turbocharging, supercharging, or procharging. Within FSAE, a fair number of teams run forced induction, but the majority remain naturally aspirated. [citation?, not sure how to cite that I saw like 5/100 at competition in Michigan and Lincoln, maybe the competition handbooks?] | ||
Revision as of 15:11, 15 May 2020
Topics to add:
packaging
material choice
heat management
heating from restrictor
Current/Proposed Outline:
Contents
Basic theory
The intake system's purpose is to direct ambient air to your engine's air intake. On more traditional road cars and unrestricted race cars, the throttle is generally placed at the inlet of your intake runner (probably should have a source) to promote fast engine response. However, allowing a manifold between the restrictor and throttle body will limit the effects of the restriction(citation). This is negated in FSAE by preventing a large volume (plenum/manifold, intercooler, etc.) prior to the throttle body. The order of system components defined by rules can be seen in the figure right and each component is discussed further down this page.
Throttle control
should probably move down - not important enough to be all the way up here. The throttle allows modulation of the air coming into your intake system. Within FSAE, the throttle must fall between your restrictor and manifold or, in boosted applications, between your turbocharger/supercharger and manifold. Common solutions include actuation by throttle cable or by electronic throttle body (ETC or drive-by-wire).
Throttle form factors
now that I think about this, I think the rabbit hole details for throttle like cabling and non-butterfly throttles should get a separate page - will do later if y'all dont (-simon)
Butterfly
Barrel
Iris
Cabling
If using a cable actuated throttle, the choice and routing of cable are important considerations. A push-pull cable has negligible stretch/flex over time and will give the greatest consistency [citation needed for strecth comparison].
Other popular choices are shifting and brake cables used on bicycles. [structure of bike brake cable v shifter cable]. A brake cable will always have some stretch, and a thicker gage will stretch less.
Cable fittings are either swage or swageless. Swage fittings are permanently attached by crimping (swaging). Swawgeless fittings can be attached to the cable in a number of ways including set screws or collets. [citation for fittings] Swageless fittings allow for a degree of adjustment as the cable stretches.
[insert image of swageless v swage fittings]
Dry lube like graphite or molybdenum disulfide are the best go to for high quality cable sheathing. However, if the cable is in a wet/humid environment or the sheathing is old or slightly damaged, a liberal dose of a high quality oil such as motor oil is desirable[ciitation needed]. Non-synthetic oils like mineral oil can degrade the cable housing [citation needed]. WD-40 may also degrade the housing and will dissolve the lubricant applied to the cable by the manufacturer [citation needed].
Further reading here: <a href="https://www.sheldonbrown.com/cables.html">https://www.sheldonbrown.com/cables.html</a>
add routing info also
ETC
- Main page: Electronic Throttle Control
overview and driving rationale how it fits into system not specific design info
Intake tuning
(I dont know where this should go: The intake manifold typically runs from the plenum to the cylinder heads / air intake ports on the engine. It's design can be adjusted to increase performance using the tuning methods below. The manifold also contains ports for the fuel injectors. (i think this is a great place for it, maybe a section about intake structure above this to clear up all the terminology? -simon)
Maybe make an intake system terminology section? I agree though, probably better to have more than less information
Tuning takes two forms for the intake manifold: the first is in modifying the length of the manifold (ram tuning) and the second is in modifying the shape of the manifold (including Helmholtz resonators).
Ram tuning
The basic principle behind ram tuning is that a cylinder intakes air at a particular frequency, i.e. a cylinder only takes in air for a quarter of a four stroke cycle, meaning that there is a stop-starting of the flow of air into the cylinder. This occurs at a frequency dependent on the rpm of the engine, hence ram tuning is done to optimize performance at a selected rpm. The way in which it is implemented is to modify the length of the manifold such that the pressure wave formed on each cycle travels along the manifold and is reflected back, arriving just as the cylinder completes the cycle and takes in its next lot of air. This means that the pressure at the inlet will be higher whenever the engine needs air, giving better volumetric efficiency for the engine.The parameters to adjust regarding ram tuning is the diameter and length of your intake runner, in port injection applications, this is also known as the injector body.
In more complex ram tuning applications, actuated baffles can be created to vary engine torque curve. This is done on many production cars to allow different behavior at low and high RPM.
Trade-offs
Pros
- Relatively simple system
- Allows for movement of your torque curve
Cons
- Simulations are often inaccurate and may require on vehicle testing to confirm optimal performance
- Can only tune to one optimal frequency, unless baffles are integrated
Helmholtz resonators
Helmholtz resonators work by having a thin neck followed by an open cavity attached to the engine's intake. Their design result in low pressure at the neck, sucking in more air, and resulting in higher pressure air in the cavity, which can then feed the engine. Both ram tuning and Helmholtz resonators are simple methods to increase engine efficiency.
trade-offs
mounting
Plenum
- why we have plunem
- sizing considerations
- shape/ form factor?
- conical spline
- top/center feed
- side feed
- <a href="http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.582.6654&rep=rep1&type=pdf">http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.582.6654&rep=rep1&type=pdf</a> source for intake shape
- dual plenum
- variable volume
Restrictor power limit derivation
Should we put in separate page?
I think it is good information, but shouldn't be at the top because it isn't the most important aspect of the intake system. Probably put the limit in basic info and reference the calculation further down in the page.
agreed, also is a good lead-in to forced induction
general equation
for ideal compressible gas flow:
| A |
Area |
| R |
Gas Constant |
| Total Temperature | |
| Specific Heat Ratio | |
| M |
Mach number |
| Total Pressure |
when M becomes 1, the flow is considered choked. The equation becomes:
With some basic assumed values at sea level, the maximum mass air flow through the restrictor can be found:
| A |
3.14 e-4 |
m^2 |
| R |
0.286 |
kJ/kg-K |
| 300 |
K | |
| 1.4 |
||
| M |
1 |
|
| 101.325 | kPa |
[citation needed for above values?]
Plugging these into the equation above yields a steady state mass flow rate of 0.074 kg air per second
If we assume an AFR of 13.1 (typical lambda for high torque for NA engines[citation needed]), and a QLHV of 46 MJ/kg [citation needed], the mass air flow yields a power limit of 265.5 kW or 356 hp total energy output. If the thermal efficiency of the engine is assumed to be a nominal 33%, the maximum available mechanical power is 88.5 kW or 118 horsepower with 100% volumetric efficiency.
This limit can be exceeded by increasing the upstream pressure to greater than 1 atmosphere. This pressure increase is called forced induction.
Forced induction
Forced induction is done by utilizing a compressor to increase the pressure seen in your manifold/plenum, leading to increased engine power and efficiency. This is accomplished by the higher manifold pressures being able to force more air into the cylinder/s on each intake stroke. The increased air in the cylinder means you can burn more fuel and maintain the same air-fuel-ratio. A denser charge will also combust faster, yielding greater energy utilization and efficiency. Common methods of implementing forced induction is by turbocharging, supercharging, or procharging. Within FSAE, a fair number of teams run forced induction, but the majority remain naturally aspirated. [citation?, not sure how to cite that I saw like 5/100 at competition in Michigan and Lincoln, maybe the competition handbooks?]
Turbocharging
theory
trade-offs
Supercharging/Procharging
ETS pls