http://fswiki.us/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Thread%3AUser_talk%3AEmilyanthony%2FNew_Category_for_%22Scrutineering%22%2FreplyThread:User talk:Emilyanthony/New Category for "Scrutineering"/reply - Revision history2026-07-26T15:06:16ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.34.1http://fswiki.us/index.php?title=Thread:User_talk:Emilyanthony/New_Category_for_%22Scrutineering%22/reply&diff=1735&oldid=prevEmilyanthony: Reply to New Category for "Scrutineering"2020-06-04T16:30:53Z<p>Reply to <a href="/Thread:User_talk:Emilyanthony/New_Category_for_%22Scrutineering%22" title="Thread:User talk:Emilyanthony/New Category for "Scrutineering"">New Category for "Scrutineering"</a></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>Sure - I can make the scrutineering category. <br />
<br />
The scrutineering article can have sections for general info and then the breakdown per class in each section. However, having categories named "EV" "DV" etc won't work as MediaWiki isn't smart enough to distinguish a sub-category as its own unique thing. If someone were to make an "EV" category for elsewhere in the site, both categories would be the same. <br />
<br />
The scrutineering article can have these distinguishers or perhaps have their own articles called "EV Scrutineering" and so forth, but I am not sure it's necessary to categorize them uniquely.</div>Emilyanthony